![]() ![]() Save under a new file name and close all, then re-open. Carefully select all of the text in the bad document EXCEPT the lastĥ. Web Page sometimes fixes these, and it's easier:Ģ. ![]() It won't be field codes, but it MAY be a corrupt document, and that will beĪ bit more of a challenge to fix. See if that brings it right before we go looking further. Then go into Tools>Spelling and Grammar and check "Recheck Document". Select the whole document and use Format>Language>Set Language to set the If the Language is set to "No Proofing" the spelling checker will be The first place I would look is the Language, not the field codes. > Interesting update but one which I can't fully explain :-} Not sure if that helps at all, but hopefully. I don't see any field codes in longer selections, and I've made sure to choose text not near an indent, paragraph break, or page break, but it's restricted to the 3 lines.įinally, I searched the Word Helpfile for any info about on field codes and page numering, but I can't find anything suggesting that it may interfere with the reading stats. The odd part is, I've found that reading stats will work in the unformatted proposal if I run the check on not more than 3 consecutive lines. Every one has some combination of inserted references, hyperlinks, and auto-numbered pages. Then, I went through my documents (reading stats have never worked for any of them on this computer) and looked at field codes. I displayed field codes for each, and the all that appeared were the auto page numbers. The only difference between the two is that the proposal has a header with page numbers. I tried it again in both, but stats only worked in the new one. While in the new document, I inadvertently ran the spell-check, and the stats appeared! I'm in the midst of revising a proposal, and I've been cut-pasting text into a new. I think I may have stumbled across a clue, though I'm not sure how to interpret it. Should replicate the whole thread out so we can get the context. If you add to an existing thread, the forum EeeeThe forum is supposed to replicate posts out to the NNTP server where most Serving of KFC began as a hen, and that if you cut the head off a liveĬhicken, the body will often run around in a random pattern for several Those who did not grow up on a farm may not realise that your average Headless Chicken" because its behaviour is at times indistinguishable from aĬhicken whose head has just been cut off. Some MVPs (me, for example.) refer to the "Forum" as "The Electronic Send me a copy of that document if you like, and I will see if I can find If you have, you willĭisable all the proofing tools including the readability count. "No Proofing" or a language you don't have installed. On your Readability level, make sure you do not have the text tagged with ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |